Build vs Buy
Weighing the Options for Deception Technology
Deception technology is fast becoming a key part of modern cybersecurity strategies, helping organisations detect and disrupt attackers before they can do real damage. For security leaders, the question isn’t whether to adopt deception—it’s whether to build a custom solution in-house or buy an off-the-shelf product, like the Deception-as-a-Service offering from Seedata.io.
While we, of course, believe that buying a solution makes sense for most businesses (it’s what we do, after all), there are legitimate reasons to consider building your own system. Let’s take a fair look at both options.
Building: Total Control, but Significant Investment
Building an in-house deception system means you have complete control over every detail. You can tailor it specifically to your organisation’s needs and ensure that it aligns perfectly with your broader security architecture. This approach can make sense for very large organisations with a highly skilled security team, enough resources to develop the system, and the capacity to maintain it long-term.
But it’s important to be realistic about the time, effort, and cost that goes into building a deception platform from scratch. This isn’t just a one-off project; it’s an ongoing process. The initial build can take months (or longer), and once it’s in place, you’ll need to constantly update and evolve it to stay ahead of attackers. Deception isn’t static—cyber threats are always changing, and so your traps and strategies will need to adapt too. That means dedicating people and budget not just to the initial creation, but to regular maintenance, testing, and upgrading.
If you’ve got the resources and a team that’s excited by the challenge, this might be a good fit. But for many organisations, it’s worth asking whether this is the best use of internal talent and time.
Buying: Fast, Flexible, and Fully Managed
On the other hand, buying an off-the-shelf deception solution—like Seedata.io’s Deception-as-a-Service—offers speed and simplicity. Instead of investing months into development, you can have a pre-built solution in place and operational within days or weeks. That’s valuable when attackers aren’t waiting for your project timelines to wrap up.
A purchased solution also removes the heavy lifting of ongoing maintenance. Seedata.io, for example, continually updates and fine-tunes its deception platform, meaning your traps stay fresh and effective without additional strain on your team. For businesses where internal resources are already stretched or focused on other priorities, buying a ready-made solution allows you to benefit from deception without needing to devote extra time or headcount.
Another advantage of buying is access to the expertise that comes built-in with a dedicated product. Companies like ours spend all day focused on perfecting deception strategies, evolving them in real time to meet emerging threats. That’s hard to replicate in-house unless deception is your full-time focus.
When Buying Makes More Sense
For most organisations, though, buying is the more practical route. You get a battle-tested, scalable solution that’s ready to deploy quickly, without the internal overhead of development and upkeep. With Seedata.io’s Deception-as-a-Service, for example, you can deploy a sophisticated deception layer across your network and rely on us to keep it optimised and up-to-date.
The cost of buying a solution is also much more predictable than building. Rather than a large upfront investment (plus ongoing development and operational costs), you’re looking at a subscription model that spreads the expense over time. For budget-conscious teams, this can make planning easier and provide a clearer return on investment.
Plus, for many organisations, time is of the essence. Developing an in-house deception system from scratch can take months, during which time you remain exposed to threats. If you need a solution now, buying a ready-made system gets you protected much faster.
When Building Makes Sense
There are scenarios where building your own system might still make sense. If your organisation has unique security needs that can’t be met by an existing product, or if you have highly specific internal requirements that need customisation, building can give you the flexibility to create exactly what you need. Similarly, if your security team has deep knowledge of deception techniques and the time to commit to developing and maintaining a solution, you might be in a position to take the build route.
Another reason some companies might lean toward building is a concern over keeping everything in-house, especially when dealing with sensitive data or infrastructure. If your organisation has a strong preference for controlling every aspect of its security stack, this could tip the balance toward building.
Conclusion: Tailoring the Choice to Your Needs
At the end of the day, both building and buying deception technology have their pros and cons. If your organisation has the resources, expertise, and time to commit, building your own system can offer a highly customised approach. However, for most organisations, the balance of speed, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to tap into external expertise makes buying a more compelling choice.
At Seedata.io, we believe in the power of deception to strengthen security postures, and we’ve worked hard to develop a solution that delivers high impact with minimal fuss. But we also recognise that every organisation is different. If you’re on the fence, we’d be happy to talk through your specific needs and help you weigh up whether buying is right for you.
The important thing is that, whichever route you choose, you’re incorporating deception into your security strategy—it’s a powerful tool in the fight against cyber threats, and one no business can afford to overlook.
Sign up for your free trial account
Self service signup, all features enabled, no credit card needed, for 1 month.